Mon Sept 26 |
The liminal zone between early and modern linguistics
Course Introduction
Self-introductions and interests
Sir William Jones (“Oriental Jones”)
Colonial linguistics and the beginnings of comparative linguistics
|
Readings:
-
What can we learn from Jones’ famous address?
- William Jones. 1786. The Third
Anniversary Discourse (as President of the Asiatick Society of Bengal). In The Works of Sir William Jones,
vol. 1, pp. 19–34.
-
Who was William Jones?
-
A critical perspective: What did Jones actually discover/invent? Maybe
not much? Or maybe he did open up new vistas (with good timing)?
-
How fundamental was the role of Sanskrit and Pāṇini in the
formation of modern linguistics? (In Europe and the U.S.)
|
Assign people for week 2
|
Mon Oct 3 |
A path to formal descriptive linguistic theory
Levels (mainly phonology), combinatoriality, simplicity. Sanskrit.
Pāṇini's grammar and its influence on Bloomfield. Sanskrit and Menominee.
Grammar as a maximally compact representation of language. Phonological
features. Thematic roles. Rule ordering, Blocking.
A generative grammar?
|
Readings:
Be on either Team Pāṇini and read Kiparsky 1995 and Scharf 2013,
concentrating on the Pāṇini section
(and look through Kiparsky 2002, if you wish) or be on Team
Bloomfield and read Kiparsky 1995, Bloomfield 1939, look through
Bloomfield 1926, and if you're rather keen, look at Koerner 2003
or Bever 1961.
- Team Pāṇini
- Paul Kiparsky. 1995. Pāṇinian
Linguistics. In R.E. Asher, ed., Concise history of
linguistics. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.
- Peter M. Scharf. 2013. Linguistics in India. In Keith Allan ed., The Oxford Handbook of the
History of Linguistics.
- Paul Kiparsky. 2009. On the architecture of Pāṇini's
grammar. In Huet, G., Kulkarni, A., Scharf, P. (eds) Sanskrit
Computational Linguistics. LNCS vol. 5402. Berlin: Springer.
Too long to read all of!
- Team Bloomfield
|
Assign people for week 3 |
Mon Oct 10 |
Indigenous People's Day
Development of categorization and the comparative method
Parts of Speech
From Aristotle and Dionysius Thrax (or Tryphon) on Greek to
Roman, Arabic, the Middle Ages, and beyond
Development of the comparative method and the Neogrammarians: Grimm, Brugmann
|
Readings:
Choose either parts of speech or historical linguistics. I'll
be looking for 4 people to lead discussion of 1.1-4, 1.2, 2.2, and
2.3. But also look at other things in your area!
- Parts of speech
- Historical typologies
- Aristotle. 350BCE. On Interpretation. Translated by
E. M. Edghill. Read Chapters 1–4 (3 pages).
- Dionysius Thrax (?). 200BCE–400. Τέχνη γραμματική [Art of
Grammar]. Translated by Anthony Alcock. Read sections 12
through the end, but you can skip all the details of the different
noun types, etc. (9 pages).
- G. Bohas, J.-P. Guillaume, and
D.E. Kouloughli. 1990. The Arabic Linguistic Tradition
(excerpt on parts of speech, 4 pages). London: Routledge.
- Viti, Carlotta. 2014. Latin parts of speech in
historical and typological context. Journal of Latin
Linguistics. 13: 279–301 (extract on Yāska's Sanskrit
part-of-speech classification).
- Parts of speech
table. Augmented version of R.H. Robins, A Short History of
Linguistics, p. 42. (Chris will say a few words about this!)
- William Croft. 2000.
Parts
of speech as language
unversals and as language-particular categories. In Petra M. Vogel
and Bernard Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word
classes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- The comparative method and the Junggrammatiker
- Sally Thomason. 2007. Fitchifying the history of
linguistics. Language Log.
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/005021.html
- Jacob Grimm. 1893. Deutsche Grammatik. Gütersloh:
C. Bertelmann, vol. I, pp. 580–592. From Winfred
P. Lehmann. 1967/2005. A Reader in Nineteenth Century
Historical Indo-European Linguistics. Note: This is from a
later edition, but it was originally written 1819–1837.
- Hermann Osthoff and Karl Brugmann. 1878.
Morphologische
Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der
indogermanischen Sprachen, vol. I, pp. iii–xx. Leipzig: S. Hirzel. From Winfred
P. Lehmann. 1967/2005. A Reader in Nineteenth Century
Historical Indo-European Linguistics.
- Karl Brugmann. 1876.
Nasalis sonans in der indogermanischen Grundsprache.
Curtius Studien 9: 287–338. From Winfred
P. Lehmann. 1967/2005. A Reader in Nineteenth Century
Historical Indo-European Linguistics. (You don't need to
read this, but you might look at Lehmann's introduction. I just stuck
it here to convey that the Neogrammarians did engage themselves in
substantive comparative grammatical work, not just position statements!)
- Jacques Bailly. 2020. Grimm’s Law class
notes. University of Vermont.
|
|
Mon Oct 17 |
Semiotics and structuralism
Wilhelm von Humboldt, Ferdinand de Saussure, Roman Jakobson (and
the Prague School)
|
Readings:
Everyone should read the extract from de
Saussure. Since how can you not? And then you should choose
something else of interest
- The bringing forth of language is an inner need that evolves
humankind (!) and an intro to who Humboldt was.
-
Wilhelm von Humboldt 1836 [1988]. On Language: The
Diversity of Human Language-Structure and its Influence on the
Mental Development of Mankind.. Translated by Peter Heath
with an introduction by Hans Aarsleff. Cambridge UP. Chapters 3–5,
pp. 54–64.
-
Hans Aarsleff. 1988. Introduction to On Language, part I,
pp. vii–xvii.
- The origins of linguistic relativity
-
Wilhelm von Humboldt 1836 [1988]. On Language. chapter 9,
pp. 54–64.
-
John Leavitt. 2006. Linguisitic Relativities. In Christine
Jourdan and Kevin Tuite (eds.) Language, Culture, and
Society. Cambridge UP. pp. 47–55.
- Beginnings of Linguistic typology
-
Wilhelm von Humboldt 1836 [1988]. On Language. chapter 19
and 20 to page 168.
-
Randy La Polla. 2020. Forward to the past: modernizing
linguistic typology by returning to its roots. Asian
Languages and Linguistics 1(1): 146–166, pp. 1–5.
- Chomksy's take on Humboldt
-
Wilhelm von Humboldt 1836 [1988]. On
Language. chapter 8 and 13.
-
Hans Aarsleff. 1988. Introduction to On Language, part II,
pp. xvii–xxxii.
-
Chomsky. 1964. Current issues in linguistic
theory. The Hague: Mouton, chapter 1, pp. 7–27.
- de Saussure: Synchronic, structuralist linguistics
-
Ferdinand de Saussure. 1916 [1983]. Course in General
Linguistics. Introduction, chapter III and Part One, chapter I.
|
First squib due! – I'm okay with getting it by end-of-day Thursday! |
Wed Oct 26, 10:30–1:20 Linguistics basement large meeting room |
Note that class is rescheduled to Wednesday, since Chris is
away at start of week at LMB Program Meeting
Semiotics and (the rest of) the era of American Structuralism
Jakobson. Boas, Sapir, Whorf, Hockett, Harris. Externalism and Emergentism.
General overview of American linguistics 1900-1950.
|
Readings:
We have assigned presenters for Jakobson. For American
structuralism, we have chosen 3 of Boas, Sapir, Harris, Hockett, or
Whorf and everyone is reading one of them. For Sapir,
please read both readings. For Harris, you only need to read the
Morpheme Alternants paper, but flick through the pages of From
Morpheme to Utterance, to get a sense of the hard-to-read,
semi-formalized style of a lot of Harris's later papers…. For
Hockett, read the paper (!).
- Jakobson: Structuralism and phonology
-
Steven C. Caton. 1987. Contributions of Roman
Jakobson. Annual Review of Anthopology 16: 223–260, pp. 223–237.
-
Roman Jakobson and Morris Halle. 1956. Phonology and
Phonetics. In Roman Jakobson and Morris Halle (eds.), Fundamentals
of Language, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 1-51. Reprinted in Jakobson's
collected works, phonological studies.
- Jakobson: Poetics
-
Roman Jakobson. 1960. Closing Statement: Linguistics and
Poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language.
-
Steven C. Caton. 1987. Contributions of Roman
Jakobson. Annual Review of Anthopology 16: 223–260, pp. 238–253.
- Boas
-
Franz Boas. 1911. Introduction.
Handbook of American Indian Languages, Vol
1. pp. 1–83. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 40. Washington,
DC: Government Print Office. Selected interesting parts.
- Sapir
-
Edward Sapir. 1922. Language: An
Introduction to the study of speech, Introductory chapter.
-
Edward Sapir. 1925. Sound
patterns of language. Language 1(2): 37-51.
- Bloomfield
Don't forget that we've already seen two papers by
Bloomfield (effectively the most important American Structuralist)
previously.
- Harris
-
Zellig S. Harris. 1942. Morpheme Alternants in
Linguistic Analysis. Language 18(3): 169–180.
-
Zellig S. Harris. 1946. From morpheme to
utterance. Language 22(3): 161–183.
- Hockett
-
Charles F. Hockett. 1954. Two Models of
Grammatical Description. Word 10(2–3): 210–234.
- Whorf
-
The Punctual and segmentative aspects of verbs in Hopi.
-
An American Indian model of the universe.
|
|
Mon Oct 31 |
Early Generative Grammar
Noam Chomsky. Early developments in generative grammar. Essentialism.
|
Readings:
Today, we'll look at early Chomsky, as the corner stones of
the development of generative grammar, and catch up on the last
piece of Jakobson. Everybody should read Chomsky!
- Chomsky: Syntactic Structures
-
Noam Chomsky. 1957. Syntactic Structures. THe Hague:
Mouton. Preface + Ch. 1–4.
-
Noam Chomsky. 1957. Syntactic Structures. THe Hague:
Mouton. Ch. 5–6.
- Chomsky: Aspects
-
Noam Chomsky. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of
Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Preface + Ch. 1, §1–5.
-
Noam Chomsky. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of
Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Ch. 1, §6–9.
Additional sources
-
Barbara Scholz, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Geoffrey
K. Pullum, and Ryan Nefdt. 2022. Philosophy of
Linguistics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [web]
[cached pdf].
-
Biolinguistics (if you only look at one of these, I'd look
at the first – it's quite the manifesto; I guess they're trying to
compete with the Junggrammatiker!): [Boeckx/Grohmann 2007], [Chomsky
2007], [Boeckx 2013].
|
|
Mon Nov 7 |
The socio-cultural character of language
Weinreich, Labov & Herzog; Labov; Silverstein;
Chambers; Eckert; Tomasello
|
Readings:
Choose one thing to read. Hopefully we can get 2 people per reading.
-
Uriel Weinreich, William Labov, and Marvin
I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical Foundations
for a Theory of Language Change. In
Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium
edited by W. P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. A bridge
between diachronic and synchronic empirical linguistics; tells its
own history of the field. Read through the end of section 2 (p. 150).
-
William Labov. 1966/2006. The
Social Stratification of English in New York
City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ch. 1 and 3.
Foundational work of modern sociolinguistics. This extract is
from the 40th anniversary edition. Commentary added in 2006 is in
square brackets. I'm not sure whether having it is an improvement
or not.
-
Michael Silverstein. 1979. Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology. In
The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels,
edited by Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer,
193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. Silverstein
provides a through-line from Boas to semiotic functionalism and
his concept of ideologies.
-
Michael Tomasello. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human
Cognition. Harvard University Press, ch. 1 and 4. Links socio-cultural
context of humans to cognitive science.
-
Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
|
Second squib due. (I'm okay with getting it by the end of the week.)
|
Mon Nov 14 |
Probability, Information Theory, and Language
Zipf, Shannon, Gleason, Jelinek, and Sankoff.
|
Readings:
- George Kingsley Zipf. I’m here butting together an extract
from Zipf’s 1949 book with George Miller’s introduction to the
reprinting of Zipf’s 1935 book. But that seemed to me the best
result, since the 1949 version is clearer and more succinct than
the 1935 version, while Miller’s later-written introduction provides useful
analysis and context.
-
George Kingsley Zipf. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of
Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge,
MA: Addison-Wesley. Ch. 2, pp. 19–31.
-
George A. Miller. 1965. Introduction
to the reprinted version of George Kingsley Zipf, The Psycho-Biology of Language
(1935). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. v–xii.
- Claude Shannon. Shannon essentially invented the field
on Information Theory single-handedly, while working at Bell Labs
in the late 1940s. We skip his (original, key, longer) more technical exposition.
-
Warren Weaver. 1949. Recent
Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication. In
Claude E. Shannon and Warren Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of
Communication. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois
Press. Ch. 1, pp. 1–28.
-
Shannon, Claude E. 1951. Prediction and Entropy of
Printed English. The Bell System Technical Journal
30(1): 50–64.
Hocket and Gleason. American Structuralist linguists
take note. We'll skip the book review by Hockett, but note the
amount of space it was given!
-
Henry A. Gleason. 1955/1961. An
Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston. Revised edition, 1961, Ch. 23: The Process
of Communication.
-
Charles F. Hockett. 1953. Review of The Mathematical Theory
of communication by Claude L. [Should be E!] Shannon and Warren
Weaver. Language 29(1): 69–93.
- David Sankoff. An interesting story between mathematics
(statistics) and linguistics.
-
Henrietta J. Cedergren and David Sankoff. 1974. Variable Rules:
Performance as a Statistical Reflection of
Competence. Language 50(2): 333–355.
-
David Sankoff. 1987. Variable Rules. In Ulrich
Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, and Klaus J. Mattheier (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An
International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society,
vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Note: There is a
second edition from 2004, but, somehow, our library seems to have
volumes 1 and 3 but not 2. I do not know whether the article is
revised therein.
-
David Sankoff. 1978. Probability and
linguistic variation. Synthese 37: 217–238. This one is an “extra”, but I threw it in to give a bit
more of an idea how over the decades, David Sankoff has written widely
on probability and language, including rates of lexicon change
(“glottochronology”), theory of probabilistic context-free
grammars, and their use to model code-switching, as well as the
variable rules approach, and other topics in sociolinguistics.
- Steve Abney. Another interesting story between
linguistics and NLP….
-
Steven Abney. 1996. Statistical Methods and
Linguistics. In Judith L. Klavans and Philip Resnik (eds),
The Balancing Act: Combining Symbolic and Statistical
Approaches to Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 1–26.
- Fred Jelinek. Fred Jelinek was the pioneer at IBM
Research who led the adoption of probabilistic models in
speech and natural language processing. I don't think it's so
useful for this class to dive into his technical work, but these
look-backs from Fred himself and Mark Liberman are useful thought
fodder. Note that they were both written just before neural
network approaches really blossomed in NLP again.
-
Frederick Jelinek. 2009. The Dawn of Statistical ASR and
MT. Computational Linguistics 35(4): 483–494.
-
Mark Liberman. 2010. Obituary: Fred Jelinek. Computational Linguistics 36(4): 595–599.
|
|
Mon Nov 21 |
Thanksgiving break; no class
|
|
|
Mon Nov 28 |
Semantics: Cognitive/cultural semantics; formal semantics; compositionality
Tomasello, Fillmore; Montague, Lambek; Partee, Pelletier
|
Readings:
-
Michael Tomasello. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human
Cognition. Harvard University Press, ch. 1 and 4. Links socio-cultural
context of humans to cognitive science.
-
Charles J. Fillmore. 1985. Frames
and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica
6(2): 222–254.
-
Barbara H. Partee. 1984. Compositionality. In Fred Landman and Frank Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics,. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 281–312.
-
Francis Jeffry Pelletier. 1994. The
Principle of Semantic Compositionality. Topoi 13: 11–24.
Additional sources
-
Drew McDermott. 1978. Tarskian
Semantics, or No Notation Without Denotation!. Cognitive Science
2: 277–282. Incidentally, looking back, it is highly
interesting how close cognitive science was to (symbolic)
artificial intelligence at this time: Here was the new Cognitive
Science journal publishing a paper that clearly expects you to
know the basics of Lisp programming, starting from page one and
for which 7 of the 9 (!) references are to work by computer
scientists. But his was not a weird exception. One of those
references is to Bobrow and Winograd's An overview of KRL, a
knowledge representation language, which appeared in the first volume.
|
Send a topic proposal for your final paper.
|
Mon Dec 5 |
Connectionism and its critics
Wiener; McCulloch & Pitts; Rumelhart & McClelland, Fodor
& Pylyshyn, Pinker & Prince, Feldman et al.
|
Readings: The original 1980s papers are, unfortunately, all really, really
long! I'm not sure I have an answer for this. Read for a while
from the beginning and then read whatever parts seem most
important or interesting?
- David E. Rumelhart and James L. McClelland. 1986. On
Learning the Past Tenses of English Verbs. In James
L. McClelland, David E. Rumelhart, and the PDP Research Group
(eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the
Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and
Biological Models,, pp. 216–271. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-
Jerry A. Fodor and Zenon W. Pylyshyn. 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical
analysis. Cognition 28(1–2): 3–71.
-
Steven Pinker and Alan Prince. 1988. On
language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed
processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28(1–2): 73–193.
- Feldman, Goldwater, Dupoux and Schatz. 2022. Do
Infants Really Learn Phonetic Categories?. Open Mind 5: 113–131.
[web]
An exception from my “Nothing from the 21st century rule” to
end with!
Additional sources
- Steven Pinker and Michael T. Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. TRENDS in
Cognitive Sciences 6(11): 456–463. And the replies to this
article pp. 464–474. We won't read this but this is a second
round rehash of the issues – a paper that is itself now already 20 years old.
|
|
Mon Dec 12 |
No class!
Final paper due.
|
|
Final paper due. |